![]() Something dismissed because even if people accept it, it does not mean that it is true. The company said a "significant majority" of consumers agreed with the definition of the processor cores. Last January, the judge in charge of the case ruled that he rejected AMD's argument. Thus, each of the buyers of a Bulldozer processor in the United States will receive about $ 35. They were actually a single FPU that shared resources like instructions and execution.Īn out-of-court settlement has been reached by the parties, which involves the payment of 12.1 million dollars. Windows effectively detected each processor module as two independent cores. This demand stems from the design of these processors. The lawsuit was based on AMD advertising Bulldozers with 8 cores and they did not physically exist. The only relevant thing is that the case has been closed, but at a cost, which the company will surely recover quickly with the Ryzen. The reality is that anything other than Zen has little relevance right now. A lawsuit based on the fact that the company had lied about the number of processor cores.īulldozer is a very old architecture that nobody remembers anymore, not even at AMD. A few months ago, a lawsuit against AMD for the Bulldozer processors. It has also made us forget the Bulldozer and Excavator architectures, which left much to be desired. The launch of the AMD Ryzen processors has made us forget the two years that the company spent without new processors on the market.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |